Why are eligible patients not prescribed aspirin in primary care? A qualitative study indicating measures for improvement
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Despite evidence-based guidelines, aspirin prescribing for the secondary prevention of stroke is sub-optimal. Little is known about why general practitioners do not prescribe aspirin to indicated patients. We sought to identify and describe factors that lead general practitioners (GPs) not to prescribe aspirin to eligible stroke patients. This was the first stage of a study exploring the need for and means of improving levels of appropriate aspirin prescribing. METHOD Qualitative interviews with 15 GPs in the West Midlands. RESULTS Initially, many GPs did not regard their prescribing as difficult or sub-optimal. However on reflection, they gave several reasons that lead to them not prescribing aspirin for eligible patients or being uncertain. These include: difficulties in applying generic guidelines to individuals presenting in consultations, patient resistance to taking aspirin, the prioritisation of other issues in a time constrained consultation and problems in reviewing the medication of existing stroke patients. CONCLUSION In order to improve levels of appropriate aspirin prescribing, the nature and presentation risk information available to GPs and patients must be improved. GPs need support in assessing the risks and benefits of prescribing for patients with combinations of complicating risk factors, while means of facilitating improved GP-patient dialogue are required to help address patient uncertainty. A decision analysis based support system is one option. Decision analysis could synthesise current evidence and identify risk data for a range of patient profiles commonly presenting in primary care. These data could then be incorporated into a user-friendly computerised decision support system to help facilitate improved GP-patient communication. Measures of optimum prescribing based upon aggregated prescribing data must be interpreted with caution. It is not possible to assess whether low levels of prescribing reflect appropriate or inappropriate use of aspirin in specific patients where concordance between the GP and the patient is practised.
منابع مشابه
تاثیر برنامه بهبود کیفیت بر مراقبت از بیماران دچار انفارکتوس حاد میوکارد در بیمارستان افشار یزد 1383
Background & Aim: AMI is a major coronary disease that causes a high degree of death and disability. Worldwide death rate from AMI is declining and a significant cause of this decline is due to diagnosis and treatment. However, results indicate that many patients are deprived of proper treatment. In the present study AMI quality improvement program in Yazd Afshar Hospital was implemented to...
متن کاملComparing the Effects of Adjunct Aspirin and Simvastatin on Psychopathology among Inpatients with Schizophrenia
Objectives: As a severe mental health condition, schizophrenia presents a chronic and complex clinical manifestation and neuropathology. A large body of literature exists on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. However, evidence on some dimensions of such interventions (e.g., eligible candidates, potential predicting factors of the therapeutic outcomes, safe implementation of these i...
متن کاملClinical Governance in Primary Care Principles, Prerequisites and Barriers: A Systematic Review
Introduction: Primary care organizations are the entities through which clinical governance is developed at local level. To implement clinical governance in primary care, awareness about principles, prerequisites and barriers of this quality improvement paradigm is necessary. The aim of this study is to pool evidence about implementing clinical governance in primary care organizations. Data so...
متن کاملHow important is it to keep taking the aspirin?
Those with cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease who are prescribed low-dose aspirin to reduce the risk of a further thrombotic event are advised to take the aspirin for the rest of their lives (1). But do they do so? And if not, why not? And if they do discontinue, what are the disadvantages concerning further cardiovascular events? And what are the advantages regarding reduced sid...
متن کاملImplementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
BACKGROUND Primary care organisations are faced with implementing a large number of guideline recommendations. We present methods by which the number of eligible patients requiring treatment, and the relative benefits to the whole population served by a general practice or Primary Care Trust, can be calculated to help prioritise between different guideline recommendations. METHODS We have dev...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- BMC Family Practice
دوره 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003